所有案件
重塑火星 的案件
#106981: "Couldn't remove less than maximum plants"
#106981: "Couldn't remove less than maximum plants"
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
細節描述
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
The game was at 83%, I don't know the exact number.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
The game was at 83%, I don't know the exact number.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
The game was at 83%, I don't know the exact number.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
The game was at 83%, I don't know the exact number.• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(當前遊戲指示是什麼)
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
The game was at 83%, I don't know the exact number.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
The game was at 83%, I don't know the exact number.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Some (red) cards allow to remove "up to X plants". I understand that usually one would remove maximum number of plants allowed, but in my group of friends, we tend to use the effect more softly, often removing less plants.
I think it would be good to have such option, e.g. player-dependent setting which grants the ability to either select how many plants to discard (similarly as when paying for a card with non-money resources) or to always discard maximum.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Opera for Android
案件沿革
2023年12月12日 9:08 • xspuipuke • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
This MUST be fixed as it violates the rules right now.
Plus, in rare instances, it might make sense, even outside a friendly setting, to remove only part of a player's plants, e.g., to secure they are able to place 1 but not 2 forests, where 1 forest makes them 2nd for Landlord, thus robbing a third player, my contester for victory, of 2 points.
Plus, in rare instances, it might make sense, even outside a friendly setting, to remove only part of a player's plants, e.g., to secure they are able to place 1 but not 2 forests, where 1 forest makes them 2nd for Landlord, thus robbing a third player, my contester for victory, of 2 points.
2024年 1月26日 5:28 • Karlsen • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
Agreed, it should be consistent with the rules which allow a player to remove less plants than the maximum, for whatever reason.
2024年 2月 1日 0:37 • Victoria_La • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
Yes it is 0 or all for now. Bottom of the stack for rule bugs as it seems to be very corner case.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
更改案件狀態為:
bug?id=106981