所有案件
重塑火星 的案件
#108233: "House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
細節描述
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
whenever I've played in tournaments this rule is in effect. if you can't do 2 moves you've passed for the generation after the first move. it makes games go sooo much faster (especially turn-based).
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
案件沿革
2023年12月22日 18:44 • startrekchekov • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
it should be implemented as a game setup option (no defer).
2024年 1月26日 5:22 • Karlsen • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
It should be (very) optional, as it is against the actual rules of the game.
2024年 2月 4日 17:57 • Supergravity • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I agree this would be a nice rule-variance option, but it should not delay going to Beta or full release.
2024年 2月16日 17:38 • Mr_yoso • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I agree that this should only be a (very) optional set up, as intentionally slowing down your moves is a feature of the game's design. some cards actively benefit from slowing your play, like if you get a bonus for played space cards, you may want to slow your play so that other players use their space cards first.
2024年 3月20日 5:53 • bananasplay • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
Not a fan of implementing everyone's pet house rules, even if as a table option (because then players have more things to evaluate to ensure that they the table they're considering joining doesn't have any of these implemented). Consider this a downvote on the entire idea.
2024年 3月20日 16:13 • Corwin007 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I'd pretty much be against this one for the reasons already stated, I'd have to screen games to make sure the option is not on, and since it's not an official option I'd rather not see this implemented.
2024年 3月21日 16:19 • Lumin_S • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I'm a big supporter of this house rule, and it does speed things up nicely without changing very much in the game. That said all house rule options would need publisher approval, so... anyone want to get in touch with the publisher and try to convince them it's a good idea?
2024年 3月25日 23:23 • frotes • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
+1 this variant. It can make async play much better and detracts little from the play experience
of course this would be an optional setup choice
of course this would be an optional setup choice
2024年 3月30日 14:46 • Victoria_La • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
Report short description
"game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
changed to
"House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
"game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
changed to
"House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
2024年 4月16日 17:48 • RoyalRook • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
+1, especially for turn base games. It can only improve the state of the play.
2024年 4月30日 0:57 • Shiny_Charizard • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I guess as long as there is an option this shouldn't matter, but I will always vote against this.
It takes so much away from the game strategy, so much for no gain.
BGA already has fast turn options for those who feel like the game is too slow without it.
It takes so much away from the game strategy, so much for no gain.
BGA already has fast turn options for those who feel like the game is too slow without it.
2024年 8月 7日 17:24 • Yahyra • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I agree with 'downvote' for this. I suggest finding friends /like minded players and agreeing to play in this manner.
2024年 8月17日 6:35 • ArchDevious • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I love this, please. Small reduction in strategy for a huge increase in quality of play, especially for async game
2024年11月 4日 8:39 • perfectgeneral • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
This is against the letter and spirit of the rules. Down vote.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
