#113762: "Speed up asynchronous play"
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
細節描述
-
• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？
-
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. -
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.
1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)
2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v120
案件沿革
2. Make sense
Currently, it looks like:
Player A income
Player B income
Player C income
Player A pay for authority
Player B pay for authority
Player C pay for authority
It would be half as many async turns if it instead was
Player A income, player A pay for authority
Player B income, player B pay for authority
Player C income, player C pay for authority
That's what I'm saying in item 1, not that it should be simultaneous (although I also think it should just be simultaneous)
Final remark regarding the aspect of simultaneous play, specifically for structures P3, P5, and P7, it's apparent that enabling simultaneous action is not feasible. This is due to the fact that certain rewards, such as receiving a deep space tile (with a military academy), a medal (with a transporter), or other items, are contingent on turn order. Attempting to differentiate based on which structures are in play could lead to confusion and complexity in implementation. Moreover, it's highly probable that such an approach might introduce additional issues and instability into the game.
為本案件添加內容
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
