• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？

• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？