#115339: "Please add option for simultaneous harvests"
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
細節描述
-
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖(這是個好習慣),您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務(例如snipboard.io)上傳它,然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
-
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(目前遊戲指示是什麼)
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 請描述顯示問題。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖(這是個好習慣),您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務(例如snipboard.io)上傳它,然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖(這是個好習慣),您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務(例如snipboard.io)上傳它,然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
案件沿革
A short calculation on the back of a napkin implies that simultaneous harvests would shave of about 15% of time in a turn based Caverna game, which is significant.
By now I have played hundreds of games. I don't think I was ever influenced by what opponents were doing during harvest.
The biggest waste of time during harvest is breeding, where the game halts to have you reorganize your animals, while there is plenty of space. And also when you have a ruby but no possibility to create a new breeding pair.
Instead of doing it simultaneously, automatically completing the turn of each player that cannot or don't want to do anything particular will speed it up a lot, while still allowing those who need to reorder animals or want to use rubies the chance to do so.
為本案件添加內容
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖(這是個好習慣),您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務(例如snipboard.io)上傳它,然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。
