所有案件
Deus 的案件
#115996: "Barbarian village points incorrectly allocated. "
notabug: 這並非程式錯誤
1
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
細節描述
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
I had 2 armies next to a barbarian village which had only 4 vps left in it (originally 6). My opponent had only 1 army. When the village was attacked I correctly got the remaining 4 vps, but my opponent was given 6vps!• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
Yes. Move number 32 I think. 9am CST on 2/28/24.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v121
案件沿革
2024年 2月28日 16:10 •
robinzig • 這並非程式錯誤:
2024年 2月28日 16:26 • Hi,
Looking at the current board situation and the game log, I think I know what happened here. And all the rules of the game were followed as expected.
In placing the ship to surround "your" barbarian village and get the 4VP from it, you simultaneously filled the last unoccupied space around another village (because this one water space was the only unoccupied surrounding space for both). This was a 6VP village, which your opponent had one army for, while you had none. So your opponent correctly got 6VP.
I can only assume you were so fixated on scoring the one village for yourself that you didn't notice the impact on the other one, even after the fact.
Looking at the current board situation and the game log, I think I know what happened here. And all the rules of the game were followed as expected.
In placing the ship to surround "your" barbarian village and get the 4VP from it, you simultaneously filled the last unoccupied space around another village (because this one water space was the only unoccupied surrounding space for both). This was a 6VP village, which your opponent had one army for, while you had none. So your opponent correctly got 6VP.
I can only assume you were so fixated on scoring the one village for yourself that you didn't notice the impact on the other one, even after the fact.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。