#141522: "As requested: Cards which didn't score correctly in my game"
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
細節描述
-
• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事
Noted above inline.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Noted above inline.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
Noted above inline.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？
Noted above inline.
-
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
Noted above inline.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Noted above inline.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v128
案件沿革
I will begin investigating this.
The pathing algorithm is arduous. I've rewritten it completely and it I still find insidious bugs like this on occasion.
Thank you for your detailed reporting. It helped tremendously.
As a retired software engineer, I can appreciate the complexities involved, and need for good detail in bug reports.
Some of these did not involve changes to the longest path, so I wonder it there might be other things to look at:
While moves 18 and 40 involved changes to the longest path at the time, AND were values that coincided with the path changes, moves 43, 48, and 55 increased the amount of missing points by 5 points at the same time a new berry should have been scoring pointing to a possible issue with berry scoring.
43 also involved changed to the sum for longest path, but 48, and 55 did not, although 55 did cover part of the width of a still counted path segment, but the increase in the score differential (5 vp) indicated a berry missed which was just added.
Hope this helps and curious if you think even 43, 48, and 55 would be fixed as it sounds like they may not be yet.
Since you're technically inclined, you may find it interested to open the browser javascript console and type TBP.players[93239080]["subscore"] to see a breakdown of your score at any point in the game or replay.
為本案件添加內容
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
