• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事

34

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）

34

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？

34

• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

34

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請描述顯示問題。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？