所有案件
圍棋 的案件
#14642: "Couldn't remove stones after replaying"
fixed: 錯誤已修復
2
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
遊戲介面阻擋我行使某些規則所允許的操作
細節描述
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
Remove stones from the board• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
We passed both, for the second time• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
No error• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v80
案件沿革
Eragem • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
We passed both first, then we go on the game because we were not agreed on dead stones, after that the game didn't propose us to remove stones
2020年 3月16日 17:50 •
2020年 5月 8日 22:09 • We passed both first, then we go on the game because we were not agreed on dead stones, after that the game didn't propose us to remove stones
stst • 錯誤已修復:
2020年 8月15日 11:11 •
2022年10月 5日 15:29 • At now added: a way of agreement of an action for dead stones after next series of passes: After resume game players must now agree an action for dead stones after next series of passes.If each of them will answer Yes to the question: "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", then a stage of designate dead stones will be launched after next series of passes.
But if at least one of them will answer No, then any stones remaining on the board are deemed alive for counting the score at end of the game after next series of passes.
But if at least one of them will answer No, then any stones remaining on the board are deemed alive for counting the score at end of the game after next series of passes.
ElessarDunadan • 錯誤已修復:
2025年 3月12日 14:29 • This does not fix the bug, but rather allows for cheating. In my recent table, #642822106, my opponent selected "No". He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game. I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。