所有案件
Pentaquest 的案件
#148931: "Multiplayer point count is not respected"
wontfix: 這項錯誤將不予修復
9
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則：遊戲規則有所錯漏
細節描述
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
I just checked the rules on the game publisher's website, Nerdura Games www.nerduragames.com/pentaquest .
The rules are clear and unambiguous.
I don't understand why in multiplayer the game interface counts discarded cards. In the rules, at no time is it mentioned!
This fanciful way of counting makes the game uninteresting and impossible to use in a tournament because of these too many ties, which this bug causes.
I am very surprised that the developer does not want to correct this bug already reported. (143357)
Another bug, in the multiplayer rules, when you pass your turn, you should lose a card from your army as long as there are some left (move 11)
Otherwise, the game interface is well done, just a small detail. It would be good to better differentiate the discarding of armies with the army itself, which alone must be counted for victory points.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
Move 11 and at the end• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v131
案件沿革
2024年12月10日 20:58 • excel13 • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
Replace the last sentence above with:
Otherwise, the game interface is well done, just a small detail. It would be good to better differentiate the discard of armies with the probably so-called army, which alone must be counted for victory points.
Otherwise, the game interface is well done, just a small detail. It would be good to better differentiate the discard of armies with the probably so-called army, which alone must be counted for victory points.
2025年 2月26日 15:18 • excel13 • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
Why harm the designer of this game like this?
I find it damaging to leave this game in Beta without correcting this misinterpretation of the rules (for more than 3 months) when this modification is simple.
This game could have had a better evolution on BGA.
We play it in our private group, because in this case we can change the score.
Claiming that the bug could not be reproduced when it is present in each game is disrespectful to BGA users
I find it damaging to leave this game in Beta without correcting this misinterpretation of the rules (for more than 3 months) when this modification is simple.
This game could have had a better evolution on BGA.
We play it in our private group, because in this case we can change the score.
Claiming that the bug could not be reproduced when it is present in each game is disrespectful to BGA users
2025年 6月15日 15:04 • mscharf • 這項錯誤將不予修復:
I understand the confusion with the ambiguity. I believe the website shows multiple versions of the rules and this is the implementation the publisher chose.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
