所有案件
Samarkand 的案件
#158208: "2nd and 3rd place etc. scoring aren't reflective of who was 2nd best"
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
細節描述
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
案件沿革
Umbrageofsnow • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
2025年 2月16日 20:05 • When the game gets released, this is going to make Arena mode and tournaments unnecessarily unfair.
A more complicated and probably divisive solution would be to add some additional points at the end to rank 2nd-3rd-4th by total goods + money or something, but that seems complicated and might be impossible to do well? But it's another idea.
A more complicated and probably divisive solution would be to add some additional points at the end to rank 2nd-3rd-4th by total goods + money or something, but that seems complicated and might be impossible to do well? But it's another idea.
CaptainShreve • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
2025年 2月24日 0:34 • It would be hard to create a non-money based ranking of non-winners. How exactly would it determine just who was "closest" to almost winning? This is really a "winner take all" style of game. For ranking and Arena purposes I think the most fair metric would be to say that everyone else is tied for "Last".
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。