• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事

The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）

The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？

The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.

• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)

A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile!

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？