• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事

Not really a rules violation per se, just less-than-ideal game behavior. And yes, for hundreds of games the player order has not varied. The one time we got the other player order that is possible, the challenge was issued and accepted in a different order. However, after that one game the player order rotated once and then never rotated again. Thus, after one game with the order being: FrankIncognito - KimPossibly - TinyDancer the player order rotated to: FrankIncognito - TinyDance - KimPossibly and then never changed again.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

Not really a rules violation per se, just less-than-ideal game behavior. And yes, for hundreds of games the player order has not varied. The one time we got the other player order that is possible, the challenge was issued and accepted in a different order. However, after that one game the player order rotated once and then never rotated again. Thus, after one game with the order being: FrankIncognito - KimPossibly - TinyDancer the player order rotated to: FrankIncognito - TinyDance - KimPossibly and then never changed again.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）

Not really a rules violation per se, just less-than-ideal game behavior. And yes, for hundreds of games the player order has not varied. The one time we got the other player order that is possible, the challenge was issued and accepted in a different order. However, after that one game the player order rotated once and then never rotated again. Thus, after one game with the order being: FrankIncognito - KimPossibly - TinyDancer the player order rotated to: FrankIncognito - TinyDance - KimPossibly and then never changed again.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？

Not really a rules violation per se, just less-than-ideal game behavior. And yes, for hundreds of games the player order has not varied. The one time we got the other player order that is possible, the challenge was issued and accepted in a different order. However, after that one game the player order rotated once and then never rotated again. Thus, after one game with the order being: FrankIncognito - KimPossibly - TinyDancer the player order rotated to: FrankIncognito - TinyDance - KimPossibly and then never changed again.

• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

Not really a rules violation per se, just less-than-ideal game behavior. And yes, for hundreds of games the player order has not varied. The one time we got the other player order that is possible, the challenge was issued and accepted in a different order. However, after that one game the player order rotated once and then never rotated again. Thus, after one game with the order being: FrankIncognito - KimPossibly - TinyDancer the player order rotated to: FrankIncognito - TinyDance - KimPossibly and then never changed again.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

Not really a rules violation per se, just less-than-ideal game behavior. And yes, for hundreds of games the player order has not varied. The one time we got the other player order that is possible, the challenge was issued and accepted in a different order. However, after that one game the player order rotated once and then never rotated again. Thus, after one game with the order being: FrankIncognito - KimPossibly - TinyDancer the player order rotated to: FrankIncognito - TinyDance - KimPossibly and then never changed again.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

I have played many hundreds of games with the same 2 other players as in game 683791611. Although the game claims that player order will change when the same players are detected, our player order has been stuck in the same spot for almost all those games. That is, I always play after KimPossibly and before TinyDancer. It would be more fair if our play order in fact varied.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？