所有案件
Wizards Cup 的案件
#172357: "Soldier ability triggered when it wasn't top of discard"
fixed: 錯誤已修復
4
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
細節描述
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
In round 2 the revolutionary defeated the soldier moving the soldier to the discard as well as the next wizard (per Revolutionary power).
This put a different wizard on top of soldier yet the soldier kept triggering in subsequent duels that round.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
I don't know how to see the move number but you can clearly see what happened if you watch the replay / view the game log• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Bga app
案件沿革
2025年 6月12日 2:36 •
thunder0491 • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2025年 6月12日 16:32 • table=686485694
It happened there as well when the Revolutionary put a card on top of the Traveler but the effect of the Traveler was available
It happened there as well when the Revolutionary put a card on top of the Traveler but the effect of the Traveler was available
thunder0491 • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2025年 6月12日 17:34 • Edit:
Reading all the bugs and then confirming it in the rules, this is no bug. Although visually the discarded card by the Revolutionary's powers is on top of the discard pile, it should be below the losing Wizard so the losing Wizard's dormant powers should apply
Reading all the bugs and then confirming it in the rules, this is no bug. Although visually the discarded card by the Revolutionary's powers is on top of the discard pile, it should be below the losing Wizard so the losing Wizard's dormant powers should apply
Cathbald • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2025年 6月12日 23:23 • i've had the same happen, table #686946649 move 12
Alchemist visible on top of discard (discarded by Revolutionary) but Geomancer wasn't buffed
then next turn, Geomancer is not visible but it is buffing the next card anyway
display needs to be fixed because it is confusing, even if working as intended in the rules
Alchemist visible on top of discard (discarded by Revolutionary) but Geomancer wasn't buffed
then next turn, Geomancer is not visible but it is buffing the next card anyway
display needs to be fixed because it is confusing, even if working as intended in the rules
hammastahna • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2025年 6月13日 8:50 • I thought revolutionary was implemented incorrectly, because of visual bug.
nswoll • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2025年 6月14日 18:23 •
2025年 6月25日 17:31 • BGA currently treats the wizard discarded by the Revolutionary (Void 7) as invisible/discarded to the bottom of the discard (even though visually it's on top).
This is very annoying.
So if a Void 3 (or a Soldier-Void 4) goes against the Revolutionary and loses, that wizard will still be the "top" of the discard and affect the next played wizard - even though visually (and rules-wise) a different card (the one discarded by the Revolutionary) is on top of those cards
And if the Revolutionary discards a Soldier or Void 3 or something else you want on top of discard, it has no effect.
I've been reporting these interactions as bugs, but maybe the coding team thinks that's the correct rule? Even though it is not! Check BGG rules forums or read the rules.
This is very annoying.
So if a Void 3 (or a Soldier-Void 4) goes against the Revolutionary and loses, that wizard will still be the "top" of the discard and affect the next played wizard - even though visually (and rules-wise) a different card (the one discarded by the Revolutionary) is on top of those cards
And if the Revolutionary discards a Soldier or Void 3 or something else you want on top of discard, it has no effect.
I've been reporting these interactions as bugs, but maybe the coding team thinks that's the correct rule? Even though it is not! Check BGG rules forums or read the rules.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。