#17548: "not feeding the meeples at all gives an unfair advantage"
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
細節描述
-
• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？
-
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請描述顯示問題。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
案件沿革
I already have rejected similar request in the past, it seems that people are not looking to rejected request before creating a new one, so I leave this one opened. But it won't be done.
It's not so easy to do : you lose 10 points every round, you refuse to win points by agriculture level, and you let other players have agriculture very easily.
As mentioned by admitted, in 2-player, is usually suicide in high-level games; I've seen instances where a temporary 10-pt sacrifice was useful, but the pure "get babies and to heck with food" philosophy does not work well enough to beat 400's and up.
為本案件添加內容
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。
