案件 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

Taluva 的案件

#22930: " having all but 1 player be Losers keeps the ELO quite low for all but 1 player..."

implemented: 此建議已獲實施

這是關於哪方面的案件？

Taluva #107817675

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度

請檢查是否已有同課題案件

若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

細節描述

案件沿革

2020年Aug21日 01:06 • SteveV • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

I understand that this may be the intent of the original game, but since (nearly?) all of the games on BGA have 1st-nth scoring and ELO scaled as you move down the list ...

also, I understand that the ELO system may not be ideal (here or elsewhere), but since it's the system of use at the moment...

2020年Aug21日 05:12 • quietmint • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

See the discussion at forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=13193

I'm fine with ranking first, second, third, etc. in cases where the game finishes "normally" (e.g., the rare case where you run out of tiles). But as I said in that post, I still do not believe it's correct or fair to apply the same ranking method when the game finishes "early" (e.g., the most common case where someone places enough buildings). You can't determine who is second-closest, third-closest to an "early" ending.

2020年Aug22日 23:19 • quietmint • 此建議已獲實施:

Version 200822-2312: A partial tie breaker has been implemented. If the game ends "normally" (out of volcano tiles), non-eliminated players are ranked based on buildings. If the game ends "early" (someone builds all of two types), non-eliminated players all tie.

In both cases, however, elimination order is always used as a tie breaker -- the first player eliminated always ranks last, the second eliminated always ranks second-to-last, etc.

2020年Aug23日 17:40 • quietmint • 此建議已獲實施:

Version 200823-1736: The scoring is now displayed in real-time.

2023年Nov26日 20:25 • Joe Hotson • 此建議已獲實施:

This hasn't been fully resolved. Now, if a game ends "early", all players tie 2nd. However, the ELO calculation penalises players for not "winning" against those with a lower rank, even if they only actually lost to one player with a much higher rank.

2023年Nov26日 21:07 • quietmint • 此建議已獲實施:

No bug here. There's no way to determine a rank order when the game ends "early", so the current behavior of making all losers tie is correct. (There's no way to tell who is "closer" to triggering an early ending.)

ELO calculation is done by BGA and not specific to the Taluva game. Yes, you will lose ELO points if you don't win against a weaker player you were expected to beat.

為本案件添加內容

任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:

其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

取消更新案情

#22930: " having all but 1 player be Losers keeps the ELO quite low for all but 1 player..."

這是關於哪方面的案件？

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

請檢查是否已有同課題案件

細節描述

案件沿革

為本案件添加內容

更改案件狀態為：

說明

貢獻

導覽

追蹤我們