案件 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

United Square 的案件

#23493: "Remove the actual tie-breaker"

awaiting: 此建議尚未被開發者分析過

這是關於哪方面的案件？

United Square #109874636

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度

請檢查是否已有同課題案件

若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

細節描述

案件沿革

2020年Sep1日 01:07 • compte obelète • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

I doubt that is a good tie-breaker

2020年Dec23日 11:51 • JPreto • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

No other game has a "reflection time" tie-breaker... makes no sense!

If anything a tie... or who played 1st loses.

2021年Jan28日 20:56 • postmans • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

This is quite a bad tie-breaker indeed. that time is also mostly your (one but) last turns time, not the whole game.

2021年Jan28日 20:57 • postmans • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

In boardgamearena.com/table?table=143162413 I actually used 30 seconds less than the opponent for the whole game, but lost because I used 3 more seconds in the last turn.

2021年Jun8日 14:48 • Salvidrim • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

Agreed this tie-breaker is absolutely terrible. Either a tie should be rules a tie, or a better tiebreaker tied to gameplay should be implemented, such as who played first loses, or last wins, or maybe based on number of tiles played, etc.

2021年Sep30日 11:17 • LEDave2020 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

turn based game #204888285
UK v Taiwan based players. Large 7 x7 board.

Absolutely epic game over a number of days. Thinking time was obviously dependant on when each person was online, and affected by time zones.

The result was 31 points each tie, with winner the decided 259125 v 259017.

I suggest that this tie break is a poor solution at any time, but for a turn based game is an absolutely ridiculous solution. If one person always takes their next turn within 2-3 hours, and the other 12+, there can only be one winner.

This is my last game of United Square on turn based!!!!

2022年Feb23日 17:23 • speler nico • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

Most of the time, this is indeed a terrible rule. In a turn based round robin tournament e.g., this penalties people with sleeping times a bit before their opponent or people who are less online. There is no need for a tie in a round robin, or in arena mode. In fact, often people misses trophees (top 3 tournament places) because of this tie breaker. In this way, it does not award the best players but those who are the most online. I would like to see no tie breaker or at least to be configurable as an option.

Thanks for considering this!

2022年Aug11日 05:35 • lordmcfuzz • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

This is a bad tie breaker

2024年Jan29日 16:40 • speler nico • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

I propose a more equitable tiebreaker: award victory to the player who places the last square. This tiebreaker is fair and logical, as it eliminates any reliance on players' online availability. As players recognize the game's progression towards a tie, the focus shifts to securing the opportunity to make the final move. Furthermore, this tiebreaker makes sense from a strategic standpoint: when both players vie for the last turn, the player with the most strategically positioned squares remaining in hand will have the best chance of winning.

2024年Jan29日 20:21 • speler nico • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

(continued) The proposed tiebreaker also aligns naturally with United Square. Throughout the game, areas on the board are created where it is disadvantageous to begin placing squares. Consequently, players aim to place the last square in an area, forcing the opponent to start another. It seems natural to continue this gameplay approach for the final area in case of a tie. The player who manages to place the last square in the final area wins the tie.

2024年Apr5日 22:59 • Grant Badger Fox • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

Just won a game (boardgamearena.com/table?table=495752068) with this tiebreaker. Despite having won, it feels. . . icky.

為本案件添加內容

任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:

其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

取消更新案情

#23493: "Remove the actual tie-breaker"

這是關於哪方面的案件？

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

請檢查是否已有同課題案件

細節描述

案件沿革

為本案件添加內容

更改案件狀態為：

說明

貢獻

導覽

追蹤我們