#25677: "For a nil bid, the partner's books are not added to team bid."
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
細節描述
-
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
Move #417
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
Move #417
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
Move #417
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
Move #417
-
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(目前遊戲指示是什麼)
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
Move #417
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
Move #417
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v85
案件沿革
"The usual rule is that when a nil fails, the tricks won by the nil bidder do not count towards making the partner's bid, but do count as bags for the team."
I get that it's the usual rule, but it does seem to be pretty punitive
Further, if they DID, and if the non-zero partner also got MORE than they bid, then logically the zero player's tricks should ALSO count as bags within their partner's score. You can't have your cake AND eat it !
The tricks of the Partner do not count for the nil-bid and the tricks of the nil-player do not count for his partner.
Example:
Player 1 -> Bid 0 / Got 2 Tricks --> -100 for Nil-bid / 2 Bags (took more tricks than he/she bid)
Player 2 -> Bid 4 Got 5 Tricks --> 40 for Bid / 1 Bag (took more than bid)
Team --> - 60 Points / 3 Bags
This seems logical to me
I don't have any official ruling reference, but just wanted to address that the reasoning (initially reported as a bug) is not uncommon.
為本案件添加內容
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
