• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？

• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.

cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.

For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？