所有案件
象棋 的案件
#40643: "Eternally proposing draw"
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則：遊戲規則有所錯漏
細節描述
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
A player should not be able to force draw by clicking repetitively "propose draw" on the same turn, without making any move• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
25 - 150• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Safari v11.1
案件沿革
2021年 5月 7日 10:22 • diamant • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
The proposal of a draw should have no impact on the progress of a game.
The proposal must be able to be made by any player, even if it is not his turn. It should not suspend the active player’s turn, and its playing time should continue to be counted normally. Playing his move ignoring the proposal must be considered as a NO to the proposal which must then be automatically cancelled.
The proposal must be able to be made by any player, even if it is not his turn. It should not suspend the active player’s turn, and its playing time should continue to be counted normally. Playing his move ignoring the proposal must be considered as a NO to the proposal which must then be automatically cancelled.
2021年 5月 7日 14:13 • ufm • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
At least the proposal should be allowed only once per turn, and it shouldn't count time against the active player.
2021年 9月22日 10:15 • nccc • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
actually, u should make a move b4 proposing draw.
And maybe limit the proposal to 3-5 per game.
If u used all of them, u cant propose anymore.
And maybe limit the proposal to 3-5 per game.
If u used all of them, u cant propose anymore.
2023年 3月12日 13:54 • On9EightLeg • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
boardgamearena.com/9/xiangqi?table=346890742
In this table, the player names benny1991988 are constantly asking for a draw, not playing chess, not making a move, wasting time, and passive play
In this table, the player names benny1991988 are constantly asking for a draw, not playing chess, not making a move, wasting time, and passive play
2023年 5月 5日 8:00 • SaintPower • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
Giving perpetual check is not allowed in Xiangqi, where doing so leads to an automatic loss for the giver.
A player making perpetual checks with one piece or several pieces can be ruled to have lost unless he or she stops such checking.
Perpetual checking is forbidden, and the side that checks is ruled to lose on the 3rd repeat.However,when both sides are perpetually checking each other, the game is ruled a draw.
boardgamearena.com/table?table=365988683
In this table, the player names astalatasta constantly ignore the rules,keeping perpetual check and asking for a draw, wasting time.
A player making perpetual checks with one piece or several pieces can be ruled to have lost unless he or she stops such checking.
Perpetual checking is forbidden, and the side that checks is ruled to lose on the 3rd repeat.However,when both sides are perpetually checking each other, the game is ruled a draw.
boardgamearena.com/table?table=365988683
In this table, the player names astalatasta constantly ignore the rules,keeping perpetual check and asking for a draw, wasting time.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
