#42906: "non-adjacent capture follows opponent's non-capture"
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
細節描述
-
• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事
Yes. Move 29-30
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Yes. Move 29-30
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
Yes. Move 29-30
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？
Yes. Move 29-30
-
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
Yes. Move 29-30
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Yes. Move 29-30
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Microsoft Edge
案件沿革
> All your bugs which are adjacent to one or more enemy bugs of the same shape (but not necessarily the same orientation) must eat (capture) those enemy bugs
There is nothing here which says only the newest bug can eat, or that eating must happen after a bug is placed or grows. It's just based on adjacency and the possibility of being able to grow after!
We can probably help other users by updating the wiki rules to make this clear.
為本案件添加內容
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
