所有案件
Bug 的案件
#42906: "non-adjacent capture follows opponent's non-capture"
notabug: 這並非程式錯誤
1
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
細節描述
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
Yes. Move 29-30• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Microsoft Edge
案件沿革
Bressette • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2021年 6月14日 7:32 •
2021年 6月14日 10:34 • I won the game, so not sour, just not sure the spirit of the rules was followed.
shonf • 這並非程式錯誤:
2021年 6月19日 22:04 • I thought this was a bug too! I Now see it follows from the rules of the eating phase:
> All your bugs which are adjacent to one or more enemy bugs of the same shape (but not necessarily the same orientation) must eat (capture) those enemy bugs
There is nothing here which says only the newest bug can eat, or that eating must happen after a bug is placed or grows. It's just based on adjacency and the possibility of being able to grow after!
We can probably help other users by updating the wiki rules to make this clear.
> All your bugs which are adjacent to one or more enemy bugs of the same shape (but not necessarily the same orientation) must eat (capture) those enemy bugs
There is nothing here which says only the newest bug can eat, or that eating must happen after a bug is placed or grows. It's just based on adjacency and the possibility of being able to grow after!
We can probably help other users by updating the wiki rules to make this clear.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。