• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？

• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？