所有案件
奧丁的盛宴 的案件
#51633: "Allow placement of Feast tiles in Income phase"
#51633: "Allow placement of Feast tiles in Income phase"
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
細節描述
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(當前遊戲指示是什麼)
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
It would speed the turn based game if it was possible to simultaneously do the placement of tiles for both Income and Feasting. In the early game, you may need to use the money from Income to pay for spots in the Feast, but later on you're likely to have the one or two silver necessary. Giving players the option of doing these phases simultaneously would really save a lot of delays at round end.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v95
案件沿革
2021年11月19日 20:03 • jerosen • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I think you should have a 3 step process to place income tiles, feast tiles, then bonus tiles. Right now you have 3 seperate phase/turns:
each player simultanously place income tiles then confirm -> wait for everyone
each player simultanously place feasst tiles then confirm - > wait for everyone
each palyer place bonus tiles then confirm -> wait for everyone
I don't think individual oplacement impacts other players at all. So turn based could be sped up with instead everyone doing each step, confirming simultanously:
such as :
each player place income then confirm, each player place feast then individually confirm, each player place bonus then confirm - > wait for everyone to finish all 3
each player simultanously place income tiles then confirm -> wait for everyone
each player simultanously place feasst tiles then confirm - > wait for everyone
each palyer place bonus tiles then confirm -> wait for everyone
I don't think individual oplacement impacts other players at all. So turn based could be sped up with instead everyone doing each step, confirming simultanously:
such as :
each player place income then confirm, each player place feast then individually confirm, each player place bonus then confirm - > wait for everyone to finish all 3
2021年11月25日 3:15 • nandblock • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
There may be some card effects where it matters? (I can't think of any, though--there are some cards that have effects during these stages but nothing that matters in terms of player interaction.)
I basically agree: there is no reason that players can't do these 3 phases individually, without waiting for other players between each stage. This would massively speed up turn-based play in particular.
I basically agree: there is no reason that players can't do these 3 phases individually, without waiting for other players between each stage. This would massively speed up turn-based play in particular.
2022年 1月14日 6:06 • Lud45 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I agree with jerosen, all player can played 3 phases and then wait others....
PS: I dont know all card but if one of them have effect on others player phase so play turn by turn only when this cards was already played
PS: I dont know all card but if one of them have effect on others player phase so play turn by turn only when this cards was already played
2022年 2月 6日 14:02 • Archduke • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I'm looking through the occupations, and so far, the only occupation I see which would cause a problem with simultaneous phases is Festive Hunter. Also, it's a change to the game rules, so would probably need running by the publishers? I haven't looked into this much.
2022年 2月 6日 17:05 • KeithHendricks • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
As long as it’s optional to rush through phases individually, and not mandatory, it wouldn’t change anything.
However, I should retain the right to wait for each phase step by step if I choose, as there are some strategic advantages in doing so. If I’m going second in the upcoming round, and the player who’s going first activates his lumber and stone bonuses, which will in producing provide enough lumber and stone to hit the 4V build action, I might not want to spend silver to activate the same bonuses for the same reason on my homeboard—unless I want to encourage that player to take that action for his opening move, so I can take Newfoundland or something like that. As you can see, there are strategic considerations in doing these phases step by step. That said, why not allow players to rush through these phases if they choose?
However, I should retain the right to wait for each phase step by step if I choose, as there are some strategic advantages in doing so. If I’m going second in the upcoming round, and the player who’s going first activates his lumber and stone bonuses, which will in producing provide enough lumber and stone to hit the 4V build action, I might not want to spend silver to activate the same bonuses for the same reason on my homeboard—unless I want to encourage that player to take that action for his opening move, so I can take Newfoundland or something like that. As you can see, there are strategic considerations in doing these phases step by step. That said, why not allow players to rush through these phases if they choose?
2022年 9月 7日 16:14 • Artenol • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I have totally different suggestion. I saw in multiple games options that do something like "autopassing".
What I propose would be simply asking players if they want to skip income/feast/bonus phases. I would have left bonus phase (where you can add income to get more bonuses) to wait for players to do. So it would look like this.
1) I place stuff when I place my last worker. Module asks me if I want to place tiles pre income. I click yes, I place said tiles.
2) Module a) checks if my feast tiles are placed (make it possible to save it btw before EOR, not just when the actual EOR happens) b) if not, proposes to place feast tiles. Technically proposing to place feast tiles shouldn't be allowed too, because sometimes you want/need to use silver from income, but you can just say that you want to postpone it.
Module also should warn you that you are to receive starvation penalty.
This would cut 2 actions off.
Also, when we're at it. I would be obliged if you let us place orange/red tiles on (main/isles) boards and just highlight them as red, similarly to illegaly placed green ones. It helps a lot to visualize when you plan to do bigger filling.
What I propose would be simply asking players if they want to skip income/feast/bonus phases. I would have left bonus phase (where you can add income to get more bonuses) to wait for players to do. So it would look like this.
1) I place stuff when I place my last worker. Module asks me if I want to place tiles pre income. I click yes, I place said tiles.
2) Module a) checks if my feast tiles are placed (make it possible to save it btw before EOR, not just when the actual EOR happens) b) if not, proposes to place feast tiles. Technically proposing to place feast tiles shouldn't be allowed too, because sometimes you want/need to use silver from income, but you can just say that you want to postpone it.
Module also should warn you that you are to receive starvation penalty.
This would cut 2 actions off.
Also, when we're at it. I would be obliged if you let us place orange/red tiles on (main/isles) boards and just highlight them as red, similarly to illegaly placed green ones. It helps a lot to visualize when you plan to do bigger filling.
2023年 4月 4日 23:00 • Lud45 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
@Archduke
I don't know where you are with this request but it could not be a "change to the game rules". If all 3 steps still there but allow players to fullfill there step in advance... but player who want to check other boards between there step wait for each player step (and saw only the step authorize according there owns step)
I don't know where you are with this request but it could not be a "change to the game rules". If all 3 steps still there but allow players to fullfill there step in advance... but player who want to check other boards between there step wait for each player step (and saw only the step authorize according there owns step)
2023年 5月17日 19:26 • jon_mccarthy • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I agree with @KeithHendricks. Making it an option to put income, feasting, and bonuses into one turn would be ideal for asynchronous games. Probably doesn't matter for real time games.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
更改案件狀態為:
bug?id=51633