• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？

• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請描述顯示問題。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 如果您有此錯誤的螢幕截圖（這是個好習慣），您可以使用您選擇的圖片託管服務（例如snipboard.io）上傳它，然後將連結複製/貼上到這裡。 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？