所有案件
{THIS_GAME_BUGS}
#61176: "Tournaments FAQ is incomplete / outdated"
#61176: "Tournaments FAQ is incomplete / outdated"
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
本站的某些功能異常(非遊戲過程中發生)
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
本站的某些功能異常(非遊戲過程中發生)
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
細節描述
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
n/a• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
n/a• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
n/a• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
n/a• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
n/a• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
n/a• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(當前遊戲指示是什麼)
n/a• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
n/a• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
n/a• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
n/a• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
案件沿革
2023年 5月 1日 23:48 • Mathew5000 • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
Among other things, the FAQ ought to say clearly how are ties broken. This comes up frequently in the forums.
For example, in a multiplayer-elimination tournament where two out of four players advance to the next round, which two players advance if a game ends in a three-way tie for the win?
Also, is there a different rule in the case where one player is booted so that the remaining three players are deemed to have tied even though one of them might have been way ahead in points?
The software clearly has some rule to deal with these cases (as well as ties in round-robin, Swiss, and single-elimination tournaments). Could a BGA administrator just say what the rules are and add them to the FAQ.
For example, in a multiplayer-elimination tournament where two out of four players advance to the next round, which two players advance if a game ends in a three-way tie for the win?
Also, is there a different rule in the case where one player is booted so that the remaining three players are deemed to have tied even though one of them might have been way ahead in points?
The software clearly has some rule to deal with these cases (as well as ties in round-robin, Swiss, and single-elimination tournaments). Could a BGA administrator just say what the rules are and add them to the FAQ.
2023年 6月30日 0:23 • DrRockenheimer • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
Absolutely agreed that at a bare minimum the tournament FAQ should be updated to reflect tournaments as currently implemented. And the issue of tie breakers is literally a frequently asked question.
For tie breakers, current practices seem to be:
1) Order of finish in a game that ends automatically due to the allotted time running out for the game is determined by clock time left for each player.
2) For other cases where a tie breaker is needed, either for round advancement in an elimination tournament, or final placement in a non-elimination tournament, age of player accounts is used as the tie breaker. This includes 3+ player elimination games ending due to a player being removed for being out of time, which effectively creates a tie for first place among the remaining players.
For tie breakers, current practices seem to be:
1) Order of finish in a game that ends automatically due to the allotted time running out for the game is determined by clock time left for each player.
2) For other cases where a tie breaker is needed, either for round advancement in an elimination tournament, or final placement in a non-elimination tournament, age of player accounts is used as the tie breaker. This includes 3+ player elimination games ending due to a player being removed for being out of time, which effectively creates a tie for first place among the remaining players.
2024年 2月 2日 22:24 • RomanosPower • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
I am pointing you to report #107221, which is practically for the same issue.
Every time a player is disqualified in a game, all remaining players (even those with negative time) are considered tied winners and the ones advancing are chosen inexplicably by the website.
Other users claim the players advancing are the ones with the oldest accounts, others think that they are the ones with the most time remaining, I have noted that they ate the ones who were lucky enough to have been drawn first into the particular game, that is the ones whose names appear first on the particular table.
However, none of the above probable explanations is followed every time.
Hence, it is absolutely vital that:
1. Either the above rule is added to the general Rules FAQ, or
2. An official announcement is made in the Forums, or
3. This rule is clearly stated in EVERY tournament when players apply to participate.
It is too much of a grey zone and it is frustrating to many many players, judging by forum posts.
Thank you.
Every time a player is disqualified in a game, all remaining players (even those with negative time) are considered tied winners and the ones advancing are chosen inexplicably by the website.
Other users claim the players advancing are the ones with the oldest accounts, others think that they are the ones with the most time remaining, I have noted that they ate the ones who were lucky enough to have been drawn first into the particular game, that is the ones whose names appear first on the particular table.
However, none of the above probable explanations is followed every time.
Hence, it is absolutely vital that:
1. Either the above rule is added to the general Rules FAQ, or
2. An official announcement is made in the Forums, or
3. This rule is clearly stated in EVERY tournament when players apply to participate.
It is too much of a grey zone and it is frustrating to many many players, judging by forum posts.
Thank you.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
更改案件狀態為:
bug?id=61176