所有案件
Heckin Hounds 的案件
#61868: "End scoring result seems incorrect"
notabug: 這並非程式錯誤
1
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
顯示異常:部分遊戲資訊顯示錯誤(未造成嚴重後果)
細節描述
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v99
案件沿革
wolmot • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2022年 3月28日 12:06 • It might also have something to do with the fact that my "Status" (slacking off / might get promoted) seems to incorrectly show that of the last round, not the total situation over all rounds.
Even though I ended with total score = 0, my Status still shows "get promoted to dead-end job", probably because I worked an extra shift (or the last shift?) in the last round.
Even though I ended with total score = 0, my Status still shows "get promoted to dead-end job", probably because I worked an extra shift (or the last shift?) in the last round.
ufm • 這並非程式錯誤:
2022年 3月28日 13:05 •
2022年 3月28日 13:15 •
2022年 3月28日 13:22 • The scoring is correct. You were the player with the highest score because of extra badness.
The highest player only survives when the player is sole survivor or all surviving players perfectly tied.
The highest player only survives when the player is sole survivor or all surviving players perfectly tied.
wolmot • 錯誤已修復:
2022年 3月28日 17:21 • I don’t understand your point, are you saying “the player with the highest score” can also be someone with a perfect score of 0?
My interpretation of the rules was that only players that worked too hard could get “promoted”.
My interpretation of the rules was that only players that worked too hard could get “promoted”.
ufm • 這並非程式錯誤:
2022年 3月28日 20:24 • 0 score with extra badness is not perfect per se. Only 0/0 is truly perfect.
This rule is quite relevant in multiplayer single round games, since players cannot bid 0 in single round games.
This rule is quite relevant in multiplayer single round games, since players cannot bid 0 in single round games.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。