#62195: "When you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, those Conflict Shields should be removed"
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
細節描述
-
• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. -
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Mozilla v5
案件沿革
This issue was widely discussed in the 7 Wonders Duel community, but lately the publisher explained in the FAQ o the game that the effect of Anubi and Sabotage DOES influence the Conflict Shields.
www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq
PAGE 18 - SABOTAGE CONSPIRACY
The following phrase replaces the rule concerning the Sabotage Conspiray:
"Choose 1 Wonder constructed by your opponent and return it to the box. It will no longer be used for this game. The affected player doesn’t lose the instant effects previously granted by that Wonder (Coins, Progress tokens, constructed or discarded card, Replay effect, Placement or Movement of Influence cubes)."
With Sabotage, the conflict pawn should move when you destroy a wonder with shields.
Keep up all the excellent work 👍🏻
Here again. Same problem with Anubis. It's especially annoying since this error makes Sabotage much less good than it should be. In this case it didn't deny victory for me, but it could have with less lucky age 3 cards distribution (killing the colossus should have been straight winning).
為本案件添加內容
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
