案件 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

獨家暗語的案件

#67657: "Collective Voting"

acknowledged: 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行

這是關於哪方面的案件？

獨家暗語 #282066620

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度

請檢查是否已有同課題案件

若肯定，請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

細節描述

案件沿革

2022年Jul10日 00:33 • CaptainTenille • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:

not a bug, just a suggestion

2022年Jul10日 01:00 • KuWizard • 開發者認為這並非好主意，或投資報酬率過低:

That's how it was implemented as a first draft. People from publishing company (Repos Production) played with 7 players and decided that it kills the game pace and slows down it a lot. So they asked to do the next player verification only. Pretty sure they won't decide to change back

2022年Jul10日 01:24 • CaptainTenille • 開發者認為這並非好主意，或投資報酬率過低:

so it's better to have duplicate clues got through?

2022年Jul10日 06:51 • Pompkin • 開發者認為這並非好主意，或投資報酬率過低:

for live games it is easily fixed with a countdown timer of something like 10-15 seconds for all the cluegivers when the words are presented. If nobody clicks the duplicate/invalid clue button in that time game just progress as normal. It will both speed up the average waiting time for approving clues and increase the likelihood of catching errors.

2022年Jul10日 09:00 • KuWizard • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

Ok, timer could save the situation, I'll try to present this idea if more people vote for this one (it's just 1 vote at the moment)

2022年Jul10日 14:14 • CaptainTenille • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

Since it already has been implemented before, can't it just be an option when setting up the game? If the players want it, they just check the box and get the experience that they want.

2022年Jul11日 16:09 • Pompkin • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

another problem with letting just 1 player approve of the clues is that they are very likely to improve one of their own clues that break the rules as they wouldnt give that rule breaking clue in the first place if they know the rules.

2022年Jul11日 16:10 • Pompkin • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

improve=approve

2022年Jul28日 02:16 • FT3 • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

I came here to make the same report, the countdown timer for everyone sounds like a very neat solution to the problem.

2022年Sep11日 10:42 • OutOfHabit • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

I would love to see this change implemented, at least as an option .

Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)

Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go

Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now

2022年Oct26日 14:27 • Livini • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

#311910257

A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!

2022年Nov2日 09:13 • MIB5799 • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

Possible option: Have only 3 players do approval instead of all 6. Still much much better than only one.

Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).

2022年Dec14日 17:45 • bananasplay • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

Make this a table option when creating a game so that players can decide for themselves:
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

2024年Mar7日 17:13 • TheInquisitor • 開發者認同這是個好點子，並計劃實行:

> Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.

為本案件添加內容

任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:

其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。

取消更新案情

#67657: "Collective Voting"

這是關於哪方面的案件？

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

請檢查是否已有同課題案件

細節描述

案件沿革

為本案件添加內容

更改案件狀態為：

說明

貢獻

導覽

追蹤我們