所有案件
Space Station Phoenix 的案件
#68562: "Change 'View All' arrangement - Place Ship Cards after Diplomacy Board"
rejected: 開發者認為這並非好主意，或投資報酬率過低
1
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
細節描述
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
Change to 'View All' arrangement - I think having the Diplomacy board on top, then the Ship Cards next, followed by the Space Station Parts would make the game simpler to view when planning actions.
The way it is now, we have to scroll past the Space Station Parts to get to our Ship Cards. This makes it harder to see the information we need to make all actions.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v103
案件沿革
2022年10月20日 13:52 • Zero_1627 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
Well... it's kind of personal preference IMO.
But in different moments I need different views - that's why different tabs are implemented. If everything is displayed at the same time, I have to roll to see _something_ anyway.
Question of whether diplomacy is more important than ships seems very subjective - do You like to look where You have advantage (or whether Your advantage wasn't recently usurped) and then choose an action, or choose an action You need and then maybe check whether it will come with expected bonus/won't give other player a large bonus?
I won't deny it my be important for You, but it's just as probable that another player would prefer it the other way around and will be upset. If the order is not fully configurable (which would be quite a large task I think!) - such a tailored change would be IMO doubtful.
But in different moments I need different views - that's why different tabs are implemented. If everything is displayed at the same time, I have to roll to see _something_ anyway.
Question of whether diplomacy is more important than ships seems very subjective - do You like to look where You have advantage (or whether Your advantage wasn't recently usurped) and then choose an action, or choose an action You need and then maybe check whether it will come with expected bonus/won't give other player a large bonus?
I won't deny it my be important for You, but it's just as probable that another player would prefer it the other way around and will be upset. If the order is not fully configurable (which would be quite a large task I think!) - such a tailored change would be IMO doubtful.
2022年10月20日 14:06 • Zero_1627 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
argh, sorry, I misunderstood - disregard my previous entry please. A shame I can't edit it ;) .
2023年 2月 6日 20:59 • Kayvon • 開發者認為這並非好主意，或投資報酬率過低:
Closing because this suggestion hasn't received a single vote in over six months
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
