#79532: "Enforce simultaneity"

• 如果可以的話，請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 請說明你當時想做什麼，你做了什麼，然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 這些文字存在於翻譯系統中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 當你不能動作時，螢幕上顯示什麼？（螢幕全黑？部份遊戲介面？錯誤訊息？）
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動？
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼？
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步？（目前遊戲指示是什麼）
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼（錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...）？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 請描述顯示問題。建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 這些文字存在於翻譯系統中嗎？若為真，其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時？
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v102

這是關於哪方面的案件？

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇

請檢查是否已有同課題案件

細節描述

案件沿革

為本案件添加內容

更改案件狀態為：

說明

貢獻

追蹤我們