所有案件
Caper: Europe 的案件
#85903: "London coin tie breaker not counting hideout"
wontfix: 這項錯誤將不予修復
1
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
細節描述
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
For a tie breaker, total coins wins but in a tied game, the coins that were laundered in London were not counted causing me to report only 1 coin instead of 4, thus losing me the game.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
end of game, round 43• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v111
案件沿革
Ryjaz • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2023年 4月10日 5:07 • At least one user on BGG agrees that the ocins should be counted: boardgamegeek.com/thread/2843024/coins-hideout-tiebreaker
Tammo • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
2023年 4月10日 5:09 • I would argue that it may not be a bug, because coins in the hideout are a scoring component and aren't used as buying coins anymore (so only the supply coins should count). In any case, we would appreciate a ruling here.
Kayvon • 這項錯誤將不予修復:
2023年 4月13日 16:07 • Interesting bug. Thanks for bringing this up.
I went back and reread the rules. When the rules talk about players gaining, having, and spending coins, it seems to me that they're referring to your personal stash of coins, even though they don't explicitly say that you can't spend coins from your hideout. In fact, the only time that any sort of distinction is made is on page 18 when the new cities are introduced.
If I'm going to interpret the tie breaker to also refer to the hideout coins, I would also need to allow users to gain and spend from the hideout, which seems to violate the attention. That combined with the city's built-in point bonuses for hideout coins nudges me towards leaving this the way it is.
tl;dr: I'll leave it as is for the time being.
I went back and reread the rules. When the rules talk about players gaining, having, and spending coins, it seems to me that they're referring to your personal stash of coins, even though they don't explicitly say that you can't spend coins from your hideout. In fact, the only time that any sort of distinction is made is on page 18 when the new cities are introduced.
If I'm going to interpret the tie breaker to also refer to the hideout coins, I would also need to allow users to gain and spend from the hideout, which seems to violate the attention. That combined with the city's built-in point bonuses for hideout coins nudges me towards leaving this the way it is.
tl;dr: I'll leave it as is for the time being.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。