所有案件
Turncoats 的案件
#95789: "2nd tie breaker didn't go to next player who would've played"
notupdated: 由於長期無投票／評論，本案件已自動關閉
1
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則：遊戲規則有所錯漏
細節描述
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏？
2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到？若可以是在哪步？（重播時左上角資訊）
End of game• 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v115
案件沿革
2024年 8月29日 12:16 • Sourisdudesert • 由於長期無投票／評論，本案件已自動關閉:
Report closed automatically because it has not been upvoted or commented for a while.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
