所有案件
傷心小棧 的案件
#13918: "Person who comes in 2nd place SHOULD NOT receive a boost to ELO rating"
rejected: 開發者認為這並非好主意，或投資報酬率過低
6
這是關於哪方面的案件？
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議：依我所見，有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
細節描述
-
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議，以便讓人一目了然。
Hearts is supposed to be played with 1 winner and 3 losers. Currently 2nd place gets an ELO boost. The game does not function properly when there is an incentive to get 2nd place.
ElO should be winner take all, and all 3 losers lose points equally. • 你的瀏覽器是什麼？
Google Chrome v78
案件沿革
2019年Nov19日 18:00 • tiktak292 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
For Example:
If I have the opportunity to stick the queen of spades on 4th place when I am 2nd, I am currently incentivized to make this move so I can get 2nd place and conserve my ELO ranking.
If ELO was winner take all and all 3 losers lost points equally, then I would be incentivized to eat the queen of spades. This is how the game is supposed to be played
If I have the opportunity to stick the queen of spades on 4th place when I am 2nd, I am currently incentivized to make this move so I can get 2nd place and conserve my ELO ranking.
If ELO was winner take all and all 3 losers lost points equally, then I would be incentivized to eat the queen of spades. This is how the game is supposed to be played
2021年May10日 06:18 • ursaminor1 • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I disagree. In the scenario described above. The decision would be based on context. If I think I have a chance to take 1st, I'll choose one way, whereas if I think there's no chance I'll choose the way that preserves my 2nd place status. The way ELO is awarded matches the way this game is played in person: everyone would prefer to take 2nd place over 3rd or 4th, so the incentive is the same.
2021年Jul7日 02:28 • KingJakeoffsuit • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
The person from may 9th clearly doesn't understand the concept of the game, or the strategy. This is a huge deal, having a second place ruins a normally perfect game
2022年Jan20日 11:44 • pheon • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
This should be implemented ASAP. There are either change the ELO award (only first will have +, all others -)
Or change the result of the game: winner is 1st and all others 2nd
Or change the result of the game: winner is 1st and all others 2nd
2022年Jul7日 23:35 • Just Keep Climbing • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I disagree with this suggestion. In most 3+ player games, one person is a winner, yet while the other players are not considered winners, there is still a second place, such as in Azul, Can't Stop, CATAN, 6nimmt!, Tock, Yahtzee, etc. I believe that ELO for hearts should be treated the same way as any of these other games and I ask that the devs reject this suggestion.
2023年Jul31日 03:52 • SleeperService • 開發者認為這並非好主意，或投資報酬率過低:
Too bad. I've played Hearts for over 65 years. There's never been a "second place". So what if these other new fangled "games" do.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊，都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號／步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題？
- 問題是否發生了好幾次？每次都發生？時好時壞？
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
