所有案件
瘟疫危機 的案件
#44293: "Bring turn based players back to the table between step 2/3 of Epidemic cards (Rather than after 3)"
#44293: "Bring turn based players back to the table between step 2/3 of Epidemic cards (Rather than after 3)"
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
細節描述
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(當前遊戲指示是什麼)
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v91
案件沿革
2021年 7月 5日 6:59 • Dislexsick • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
This is an alternative suggestion to boardgamearena.com/bug?id=44292
Both are in service of allowing more information to turn-based players about what was in the discard pile that just got shuffled as this information is easily missed.
In a game played IRL we will always use the privilege provided to us by the rules ("Players may freely examine either discard pile at any time") to ensure we know, and then track what is being shuffled and placed on the Infection draw pile
Both are in service of allowing more information to turn-based players about what was in the discard pile that just got shuffled as this information is easily missed.
In a game played IRL we will always use the privilege provided to us by the rules ("Players may freely examine either discard pile at any time") to ensure we know, and then track what is being shuffled and placed on the Infection draw pile
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
更改案件狀態為:
bug?id=44293