所有案件
七大奇蹟:對決 的案件
#60992: "Purple Card Scoring Glitch"
#60992: "Purple Card Scoring Glitch"
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
規則:遊戲規則有所錯漏
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
細節描述
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
its visible on the final score screen which link is below• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
its visible on the final score screen which link is below• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
its visible on the final score screen which link is below• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
its visible on the final score screen which link is below• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(當前遊戲指示是什麼)
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
its visible on the final score screen which link is below• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
its visible on the final score screen which link is below• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Scoring for purple cards in 3rd round. I finished with more gold (richest city) AND most wonders (4) so my purple score should have been 16, it was 8. His purple should have been JUST browns and grays (7) and it gave him 14• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v98
案件沿革
2022年 5月27日 22:11 • JustTheNutNothing • 開發者尚未重現這項錯誤:
I agree. Purple cards are not being scored properly
2022年 9月16日 9:38 • JumpMaybe • 這並非程式錯誤:
Not a bug, please read:
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17889
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17889
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
更改案件狀態為:
bug?id=60992