所有案件
卡坦島 的案件
#62039: "A "don't have" button in trading"
#62039: "A "don't have" button in trading"
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,有些調整將大幅增進遊戲完成度
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
細節描述
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(當前遊戲指示是什麼)
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
The option of a "don't have"-button is interesting trading option. Now you can only choose between refuse once or refuse all. But if they are constantly asking for a good that you don't have, you're a bit forced to use the "refuse all" button (or 10times the "refuse once"-button). It doesn't mean that you don't have that resource, that you ain't willing to trade other resources.
Also there are too many clicks in the trade.
Instead have 3 options:
- Refuse (means the single trade)
- Don't have (You don't get offers anymore for that specific good)
- Refuse all trades this round.
That way you save a click-action, which makes the game smoother.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
案件沿革
2022年 4月 7日 3:07 • CinqueRosso • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I would modify this to a "don't care to trade" for a particular, or all, resource(s)
That way one can choose how much information to share and be more clear about one's trading interests.
That way one can choose how much information to share and be more clear about one's trading interests.
2022年 5月21日 19:04 • Soliloquy_ • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
I agree with CinqueRosso's suggestion ... it's nobody's business why someone decides not to trade ... but also recognize people have to be less sensitive to the word "refuse". This is a competitive, not collaborative, game.
2022年 7月13日 5:03 • MrCab • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
While potentially useful, the game does have a chat feature. If you want to tell players what you have, (legal) table talk is right there.
2022年 7月14日 11:43 • bananasplay • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
Upvoting this for CinqueRosso's suggestion in particular: it is unwise to divulge more info than necessary.
2022年 8月 4日 14:19 • MrBeardy • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
ditto for cinquerosso's suggestion as crafty players can use the "I don't have" response to inform how to target monopoly cards.
2022年 8月17日 13:01 • Jim_Scott • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
A player repetitively continued trade offers until my play time ran to zero when it was
not my turn. And then expelled me from the game. So, it would also be beneficial to
everyone, that if there were a "Do Not Have" Trade button would have a
"Stop Trade Offers" option when a player is deliberately running your play clock out.
not my turn. And then expelled me from the game. So, it would also be beneficial to
everyone, that if there were a "Do Not Have" Trade button would have a
"Stop Trade Offers" option when a player is deliberately running your play clock out.
2022年 8月17日 18:52 • MrCab • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
This probably goes with the thinking time problem - if a player is being penalized for "thinking time" while trading, then trading can be abused into not winning the game but timing out your opponents.
"Don't Have", or perhaps "refuse All", would help with that.
"Don't Have", or perhaps "refuse All", would help with that.
2022年 9月17日 13:26 • Livini • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
'Don't have' is too much info. If someone has a Monopoly card, they can use this info to their benefit (as MrBeardy said).
However, 'don't want to give this specific resource' would be very useful. It saves time and effort for the person initiating trades, and it saves unnecessary clicking on impossible trades for the recipient.
However, 'don't want to give this specific resource' would be very useful. It saves time and effort for the person initiating trades, and it saves unnecessary clicking on impossible trades for the recipient.
2023年 8月 7日 11:44 • sergut • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
This is already covered by Trade Alerts. This bug report should be closed.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
更改案件狀態為:
bug?id=62039