所有案件
{THIS_GAME_BUGS}
#96639: "Have 2 arenas - 1 vs 1 for competitors, game recommended number of player for others"
#96639: "Have 2 arenas - 1 vs 1 for competitors, game recommended number of player for others"
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,下列調整將大幅改善此站
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,下列調整將大幅改善此站
請檢查是否已有同課題案件
若肯定,請「投票」給這樁案件。最高票的案件將「優先」處理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
細節描述
• 如果可以的話,請轉貼螢幕顯示的錯誤訊息。
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 請說明你當時想做什麼,你做了什麼,然後發生了什麼事
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 當你不能動作時,螢幕上顯示什麼?(螢幕全黑?部份遊戲介面?錯誤訊息?)
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 遊戲規則的哪部分在 BGA 版本有所錯漏?
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 這項違反規則之處可否在遊戲重播中看到?若可以是在哪步?(重播時左上角資訊)
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 你當時想採取哪個遊戲行動?
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 你想觸發這個遊戲行動時做了什麼?
• 當你試著這麼做時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 問題發生在遊戲的哪一步?(當前遊戲指示是什麼)
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 當你試著進行遊戲動作時發生了什麼(錯誤訊息、遊戲狀態條訊息...)?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請描述顯示問題。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請轉貼未翻譯的英文字句。 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 這些文字存在於 翻譯系統 中嗎?若為真,其是否已被翻譯超過 24 小時?
• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Mozilla v5
案件沿革
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。
更改案件狀態為:
bug?id=96639