Please look at the end game screen. It was a tie but the tie breaker computation seems off.

Both me and chichiabc scored 111 pts with no workers left on the board. You can see that I had more corn. But somehow I was awared 1 pt for the tie breaker while chichiabc was awarded 21 pts making him the winner.

This looks wrong. Shouldn't I have been the winner knowing I had 36 corn and no need to use them to feed my workers.

Thanks.

I can confirm the same error with the same wrong points for the tie-break 21-1.

it.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=14920833

The traslation of the tie break it's different in italian.

(: Tie breaker: Ogni 4 Mais rimanenti = 1 Punto. Ogni lavoratore sulle ruote = 1 Punto)

Confirm the same error 21-1 stars

Same thing.

ru.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=33994015

According to english game rules:
"In case of a tie, whoever has the most workers left on
the gears wins. If it is still a tie, then all tied players win."

Neither of us had workers on a wheel. I had more corn and resources. And still a lost.

Same error.

en.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=35739433

The game result is:
1st. Green: 100
2nd. Red: 100(11☆)
2nd. Blue: 100(11☆)

But only blue has a worker left on a gear at the end of the game (Chichen Itza#9).
The correct result is:
1st. Green: 100
2nd. Blue: 100(11☆)
3rd. Red: 100(10☆)

Sorry, Green scores 101. not 100.

en.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=36111926

Another example. The game result is:
Green: 99 (21)
Red: 99 (11)

But only red has 3 workers left on gears. The correct result is:
Green: 99 (20)
Red: 99 (13)

Just happened to me in a two player game. We both scored 54 after resources, skulls, and monuments were added. My opponent had two workers on gears and I had none, but I was given the victory. It does not follow the rule book.

en.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=48715373

en.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=48276118

This happened as well in this game during a 3 way tie.

The final standings of the tied players:

ryagic 19 corn, 1 worker.
- Received 4 victory points for 16 corn, correct
- Got 30 tiebreaker points for remaining 3 corn, correct
- Got 1 tiebreaker point for worker on gear

lufia22 9 corn + 2 stone * 3 corn = 15 corn, no workers
- Received 3 victory points for 12 corn, correct
- Got 30 tiebreaker points for remaining 3 corn, correct
- Got 1 tiebreaker point for non-existent worker on gear BUG

fvlgen 5 corn + 1 wood * 2 corn + 1 wood * 3 corn = 10 corn, no workers
- Received two victory points for 8 corn, correct
- Got 20 tiebreaker points for remaining 2 corn, correct
- Got 1 tiebreaker point for non-existent worker on gear BUG

This resulted in a tie between ryagic and lufia, when ryagic should be the winner. fvlgen's tiebreaker points are also incorrect in display but does not affect the standings.

boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=62889485

Hi, this bug is still in the game. Please see game 158071860.

The rules state that in the event of a tie, the winner is the player with the most number of workers on the gears. As you can see from the final situation, only the green player had any workers on the gears. Thus, of the two players who finished with 42 points, green should have been declared the winner.

The game selected the other player (yellow) who had 42 points, despite not having any workers on the wheel.

All other calculations appear to be correct. For instance, green finished with 16 corn of which 10 was needed to feed his workers, leaving 6. Along with 2 wood traded at 2 corn each, that left 10 corn. 10 corn is worth 2 points, which was correctly attributed to the final score. The same calculation works for the yellow player, the final tally is correct. It is only the number of workers on the wheel which was not correctly tabulated.

I tied, 88 to 88 but it said the other player won

Coming up on a cool ten years that BGA has ignored this bug...