所有案件
BGA 網站
#97445: ""Skip Players out of time" button is spammy and abusable, should be a consensus vote by players."
這是關於哪方面的案件?
發生什麼事? 請從下方選擇
建議:依我所見,下列調整將大幅改善此站
細節描述
• 請簡明精確地解釋你的建議,以便讓人一目了然。
The button is abused to avoid ELO loss and can also stop a player from finishing a turn within the 20 second time by gumming up the system. I suggest that "Skip players out of time" should be a vote requiring all positive timer players, like the "abandon game" feature.• 你的瀏覽器是什麼?
Google Chrome v116
案件沿革
Trouncing • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
2023年 9月 2日 10:40 • I had made a post with 4 possible solutions but at the recommendation of cigma, I split these suggestions into individual suggestions.
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=152527#p152527
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=152527#p152527
Kayvon • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
2023年 9月 6日 1:50 •
2023年 9月 6日 22:47 • There's no "vote against" button, but I'm really against the idea, despite the very good intentions of its author.
When I sit down to a game, I often look at the maximum amount of time it will take (for games with a fixed number of turns) to ensure that the game will conclude before I need to leave. If players are allowed to keep the game running in perpetuity, they can eventually force other players to leave and take a penalty.
It's also open to abuse when multiple players are friends or at the same IP address. I worked tech support when the first generation of XBOX Live had problems with this. When a player was losing he would simply pause the game and walk away, forcing the other player to quit and take a penalty.
When I sit down to a game, I often look at the maximum amount of time it will take (for games with a fixed number of turns) to ensure that the game will conclude before I need to leave. If players are allowed to keep the game running in perpetuity, they can eventually force other players to leave and take a penalty.
It's also open to abuse when multiple players are friends or at the same IP address. I worked tech support when the first generation of XBOX Live had problems with this. When a player was losing he would simply pause the game and walk away, forcing the other player to quit and take a penalty.
ShassDow • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
2023年 9月10日 10:48 • If you don't want to skip a player you have the possibility to abandon the game and it is a vote. Suggest that this voting system be improved.
Cile • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
2023年 9月10日 11:48 • If I join a fast table I expect turns to be played quickly. I should not be held hostage by 2 or 3 players who don't care that they joined a fast table and want to take 5 minutes per turn, so they vote no to expel players exceeding their turn time
My suggestion to improve the system is to use the tools that already exist: Play at Normal or Slow speed tables instead of Fast if you cannot complete your turns within your time limit.
My suggestion to improve the system is to use the tools that already exist: Play at Normal or Slow speed tables instead of Fast if you cannot complete your turns within your time limit.
wiggles • 此建議尚未被開發者分析過:
2023年10月 3日 5:17 • I don't play realtime games, but I'm having the same trouble with turn based. I thought there used to be an option to boot a player and continue, but I don't see that for the game I'm playing. My problem is, if the game is near the end and winning players want to continue, it doesn't matter as long as one losing player decides to skip the player and end the game. All players may get the win, but its very unsatisfying.
為本案件添加內容
任何可能重現這項錯誤或了解你的建議之相關資訊,都請在此填寫:
- 其他同樣狀況的桌號/步數
- 按 F5 是否解決了這個問題?
- 問題是否發生了好幾次?每次都發生?時好時壞?
- 建議將此錯誤的螢幕截圖上傳到 Imgur.com 並轉貼連結。